Which statement best describes the scope of compensation under the division?

Which statement best describes the scope of compensation under the division?

• A. It includes every benefit or payment conferred by the division upon an injured worker or his dependents, without regard to negligence.
• B. It covers only wage replacement.
• C. It excludes medical benefits.
• D. It is determined solely by fault.

Answer: (A)

In California workers’ compensation, the division’s compensation covers the full range of benefits provided to an injured worker or their dependents, and this is regardless of who was at fault. This no-fault system means eligibility and the benefit types aren’t dependent on negligence; benefits include wage replacement, medical treatment, and other support defined by law. That breadth makes the statement describing “every benefit or payment conferred by the division upon an injured worker or his dependents, without regard to negligence” the correct way to capture the scope. The other options understate the scope (only wage replacement), omit medical benefits, or imply benefits depend on fault, which isn’t the case in this no-fault framework.

In California workers’ compensation, the division’s compensation covers the full range of benefits provided to an injured worker or their dependents, and this is regardless of who was at fault. This no-fault system means eligibility and the benefit types aren’t dependent on negligence; benefits include wage replacement, medical treatment, and other support defined by law. That breadth makes the statement describing “every benefit or payment conferred by the division upon an injured worker or his dependents, without regard to negligence” the correct way to capture the scope. The other options understate the scope (only wage replacement), omit medical benefits, or imply benefits depend on fault, which isn’t the case in this no-fault framework.